Supreme Court hears Catholic plea to participate in Colorado preschool program

Colorado bars entities from participating in its universal preschool program if they refuse admission to children based on the sexual orientation or gender identity of the child or parents.Stella Ragas / NBC News; GettyShareAdd NBC News to GoogleNov. 3, 2026, 6:00 AM ESTBy Lawrence HurleyWASHINGTON — Tackling the latest in a series of cases that pit LGBTQ and religious rights against each other, the Supreme Court on Tuesday will consider whether Catholic entities should be exempted from the state’s antidiscrimination rules so they can participate in a taxpayer-funded preschool program.

In the Election Day session, the justices will weigh whether Colorado’s refusal to grant an accommodation violates the religious rights of the Archdiocese of Denver and other plaintiffs under the Constitution’s First Amendment.

It is the latest in a series of cases in which Christian plaintiffs have pushed back against antidiscrimination measures aimed at protecting LGBTQ rights. Most such cases considered by the Supreme Court in the past decade have arisen from Colorado.

The court has a 6-3 conservative majority that regularly favors religious rights in cases brought by Christian groups.

At issue is a provision of state law that bars preschools from participating in the state-funded program if they refuse admission to children based on the sexual orientation or gender identity of the child or parents.

As Catholic doctrine does not recognize same-sex relationships or transgender status, the plaintiffs say the rule conflicts with their religious rights.

The case is “uncomplicated,” the archdiocese’s lawyers at religious liberty group Becket said in court papers, because Colorado “knowingly excluded Catholic preschools solely on account of their religious exercise.”

The Catholic plaintiffs have the backing of the Trump administration.

The preschool program, approved as part of a statewide referendum in 2020, provides taxpayer funds for parents to send their children to their preferred preschool.

The state’s lawyers, led by Attorney General Phil Weiser, a Democrat, said in their own court filing that religious schools can and do participate in the program as long as they agree to abide by the antidiscrimination provision.

The Catholic preschools “want to receive public funding without complying with those conditions,” they added.

The case before the justices on Tuesday focuses on the long-running question of whether excluding religious groups from certain government programs violates the Constitution’s First Amendment, which protects the free exercise of religion.

In a 1990 ruling called Employment Division v. Smith, the Supreme Court stated that religious exemptions are not required when a law applies equally to everyone.

FOR SUBSCRIBERSHow to watch election night: Key races, poll closing times, bellwether campaigns and moreFOR SUBSCRIBERSThe Data Dive: Steve Kornacki’s guide to early election night bellwethersFOR SUBSCRIBERS‘Terrible betrayal’: House Democrats consider whether to banish Michigan Rep. Haley Stevens FOR SUBSCRIBERSChatGPT and other AI tools rely on a small Brooklyn nonprofit for voting informationFOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump wants states to set aside ballots. So far, federal judges aren’t having it.FOR SUBSCRIBERSHow NBC News has prepared to cover election nightFOR SUBSCRIBERSDOJ will deploy a record number of monitors on Election Day FOR SUBSCRIBERSWelcome to the gas price electionFOR SUBSCRIBERSJosh Shapiro takes on Pennsylvania Democrats’ biggest challenge: Beating Brian FitzpatrickFOR SUBSCRIBERSIs Brazil the exception to Latin America’s right-wing wave? Why the region is shiftingFOR SUBSCRIBERSNetwork of independent AI evaluators aims to boost public insight into AI giantsFOR SUBSCRIBERSThe fight for young men comes to MichiganFOR SUBSCRIBERS‘A genuine toss-up’: Senate battle comes down to red states and Republican votersFOR SUBSCRIBERSEnergy drinks linked to higher risk of cardiac arrest in 18-to-34-year-olds, study findsFOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump holds final rally of a 28-stop midterm blitz Slide 1 of 1The court has stopped short of overturning that ruling in recent cases, even as it has ruled in favor of religious plaintiffs. In a notable ruling in 2021, the court ruled that a Catholic group could not be barred from a Philadelphia foster care program because of its views opposing same-sex couples.

FOR SUBSCRIBERSHow to watch election night: Key races, poll closing times, bellwether campaigns and moreFOR SUBSCRIBERSThe Data Dive: Steve Kornacki’s guide to early election night bellwethersFOR SUBSCRIBERS‘Terrible betrayal’: House Democrats consider whether to banish Michigan Rep. Haley Stevens FOR SUBSCRIBERSChatGPT and other AI tools rely on a small Brooklyn nonprofit for voting informationFOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump wants states to set aside ballots. So far, federal judges aren’t having it.FOR SUBSCRIBERSHow NBC News has prepared to cover election nightFOR SUBSCRIBERSDOJ will deploy a record number of monitors on Election Day FOR SUBSCRIBERSWelcome to the gas price electionFOR SUBSCRIBERSJosh Shapiro takes on Pennsylvania Democrats’ biggest challenge: Beating Brian FitzpatrickFOR SUBSCRIBERSIs Brazil the exception to Latin America’s right-wing wave? Why the region is shiftingFOR SUBSCRIBERSNetwork of independent AI evaluators aims to boost public insight into AI giantsFOR SUBSCRIBERSThe fight for young men comes to MichiganFOR SUBSCRIBERS‘A genuine toss-up’: Senate battle comes down to red states and Republican votersFOR SUBSCRIBERSEnergy drinks linked to higher risk of cardiac arrest in 18-to-34-year-olds, study findsFOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump holds final rally of a 28-stop midterm blitz Slide 1 of 1The Catholic challengers in the Colorado case argue, among other things, that the state program already contains some loopholes that allow for schools to apply some discretion when accepting children. They are allowed, for example, to prioritize children with disabilities and those from low-income families. Those allowances “expressly conflict” with the state’s equal access requirement, the challengers wrote in court papers.

In a separate line of recent rulings, the Supreme Court has also paved the way for taxpayer money to flow to religious groups, including schools, despite longstanding prohibitions driven by the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which bars government endorsement of religion.

Colorado argues that its allowance for specialized services for disabled children and low-income families is consistent with its equal access approach because it “advances Colorado’s interests” in ensuring that disadvantaged people are not denied entry to the preschools, the state’s lawyers wrote.

Separately, preschools operated by Catholic Charities do participate in the state program. That organization has a different mission from the preschools run directly by the church and does not require attendees to comply with Catholic teachings.

The other plaintiffs in Tuesday’s case are St. Mary Catholic Parish in Littleton and Bernadette Catholic Parish in Lakewood, plus two parishioners at St. Mary, Daniel and Lisa Sheley. The Sheleys have seven children, with one in preschool and another soon to follow.

The Sheleys have not been able to benefit from more than $12,000 in tuition assistance because they chose to send their children to the church’s preschool, their lawyers said.

The archdiocese operates 34 preschools in the state in total.

The challengers sued in 2023 but lost in lower courts before asking the Supreme Court to weigh in.

Lawrence HurleyLawrence Hurley is a senior Supreme Court reporter for NBC News.