Florida landowner wins $40k over fibre cables; court limits legal fee clause
Direct Source Verification:
This story is aggregated from The Times of India (timesofindia.indiatimes.com). Full reporting rights and copyright belong to the primary publisher.
A recent ruling by the Florida Supreme Court clarified that attorney-fees clauses do not automatically apply to future property owners. The case originated with an easement agreement involving Crown Castle South LLC and RJ's International Trading LLC. Although RJ's secured damage...
A recent ruling by the Florida Supreme Court clarified that attorney-fees clauses do not automatically apply to future property owners. The case originated with an easement agreement involving Crown Castle South LLC and RJ's International Trading LLC. Although RJ's secured damages for trespass, it sought attorney fees based on the original agreement. The court determined that the legal-fees clause lacked connection to the use or enjoyment of the land.
Original Source
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/a-florida-landowner-won-40000-after-a-telecom-company-laid-fibre-cables-outside-an-easement-the-states-highest-court-has-now-ruled-that-an-old-legal-fees-clause-does-not-automatically-bind-later-property-owners/articleshow/135628031.cms
