Byju's insolvency: Keralam Police register case over alleged forged lender letter
Kerala Police have registered a criminal case against GLAS Trust Company LLC and others over allegations that a fabricated lender-authorisation letter was used in the insolvency proceedings of Think & Learn Private Limited, the company behind Byju’s.
The complaint alleges that the letter was used to support a claim of Rs 11,432.98 crore and secure 99.41 per cent of the voting rights in the committee of creditors.
The FIR was registered at Palarivattom Police Station in Ernakulam on October 20 following a complaint by Rajendran Vellappalath, managing director of Voizzit Technology Private Limited. It invokes provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to cheating, forgery, use of a forged document and criminal conspiracy.
Byju’s entered insolvency proceedings in July 2024 over unpaid BCCI sponsorship dues of Rs 158.9 crore. The NCLAT later approved a settlement and closed the proceedings, but the Supreme Court set aside that order in October 2024 following a challenge by GLAS Trust.
The police complaint centres on a Direction Letter dated July 25, 2024, which was relied upon to establish GLAS Trust's authority to represent lenders in the insolvency proceedings.
According to the petitioners’ bench note filed in a review petition before the Kerala High Court, signature pages from a January 18, 2024 Direction Letter were reused in the July 25 letter. They allege that dates, lender names and amounts were changed while the signatures remained unchanged.
The petitioners also allege that some amounts were inserted as comments in the electronic document and signature images were copied across pages. They contend that the assembled document was a Word file converted into a PDF rather than an electronically signed document.
They have sought examination of the original electronic files alongside the earlier documents to establish the disputed letter's authenticity. These allegations have not been established as judicial findings or independently confirmed forensic conclusions.
The authorisation matters because, according to the petitioners, GLAS Trust needed support from lenders representing more than 50 per cent of the relevant loan exposure to act on their behalf.
The bench note contends that excluding the disputed signature pages would reduce lender support from approximately 95 per cent to 42 per cent, potentially calling the authorisation into question.
The complainant alleges that the disputed letter supported recognition of the Rs 11,432.98 crore claim and 99.41 per cent voting share on August 21, 2024.- Ends
I am Sanjay Shrama Deputy Editor with Aajtak. I am with this prestigious organisation and one of the torch bearer of our motto `Golden standard of journalism` since two decades.. In 2001 I jjoined Aajtak as assistant producer. and since 2003 I am with reporting team.
During this period I have been covering mainly legal beat as Supreme Court, Law ministry, Law commission, Election commission. I have covered Culture ministry as well Tourism and Water resource ministry.. Alongwith legal I am fortunate to do political stories and human interest stories.
Very fond of art culture and Indian classical music. I have been deciple of Padma Vibhushan Pandit Jasraj ji, great doyan of Mewati Gharana. Apart from this great achievement I have covered great congragation of the world The Kumbh mela at all four vanues twice.
Eager to learm languages. I can read and speak many languages apart from Hindi and English I acan read, speak and understand Urdu, Nepali, Rajasthani, Maithili, Bhojpuri and Haryanavi...
